Kucza v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently November 2002 · most notably Ferreira v. Pringle (2001), Pisel v. Stamford Hospital (1980)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brockett v. Jensen · DeCarufel v. Colonial Trust Co. · Grievance Committee v. Dacey · Thomas v. Ganezer · Bartolotta v. Calvo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . where evidence is introduced showing an apparent admission of a party out of court, he is entitled to explain the circumstances so that the trier can properly evaluate it . . . the principle is the same as that which permits a witness to explain the testimony he has given in court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.