State v. Gonski’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 1994 · most notably Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc. (1982), State v. Williams (1975)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hayes · State v. Pundy · State v. Foord · State v. Ferrone · Blados v. Blados
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state was not required to prove that the defendant himself had actual physical possession of any or all of the articles. If it was established that any of the three had dominion and control over the articles and if all three were acting, at the time, pursuant to a common purpose, then all would have possession of the articles. State v. Ferrone, 97 Conn. 258, 262 , 116 A. 336 . (State v. Gonski, 155 Conn. 463 , 232 A.2d 483 (1967).)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“trier may base one inference on facts it finds as a result of other inferences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.