Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 F.1d 133 - Hendey Machine Co. v. Prentice Bros.

Hendey Machine Co. v. Prentice Bros.’s Empirical Analysis

155 F. 133 · 1907

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
May 1908
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on McClain v. Ortmayer · Groth v. International Postal Supply Co. · Hendey Mach. Co. v. Prentiss Tool & Supply Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘•2. In a device of the class described, the combination, with a series of interchangeable gear-wheels, of a shaft driven from the said series of interchangeable gear-wheels, a pinion mounted to turn with and to slide on the said shaft, a driving gear-wheel in mesh with the said pinion; a second series of gear-wheels of various diameters arranged step-lilse on the feed-shaft and adapted to be engaged by the said driving gear-wheel, and a lever carrying the driving gear-wheel and arranged for shifting the said pinion on the said shaft and moving the driving gear-wheel in and out of mesh with the feed-shaft gear-wheels, substantially as described.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.