In re Moore’s Empirical Analysis
155 F.2d 379 · 1946
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2010
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Horton · In re Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). The court stated that it "is well settled that claims in an application which are broader than the applicant's disclosure are not allowable.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“broader than the disclosure in appellant's application and ... were properly rejected for that reason.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.