Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 F.2d 485 - Neary v. Markham

Neary v. Markham’s Empirical Analysis

155 F.2d 485 · 1946

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 1978
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 1978

10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

801946195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mississippi and Missouri Railroad Company v. Cromwell · Banaghan v. Malaney · Marks v. Gates · Haunstein v. McCalister

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Contracts between attorneys and clients, while not absolutely void, are carefully scrutinized. While they are not void as a matter of law, they are presumptively fraudulent, and will not be upheld at the instance of the attorney unless a searching scrutiny shows them to be fair, just and equitable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.