Hiley v. Barrett

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 21, 1998.

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough and well-reasoned order.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including United States v. Smith

Relies on 968 F. Supp. 1564 - National Ass'n of Government Employees, Inc. v. Barrett

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-09-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2018

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Robert N. Wilson, Jr., Monahan & Padellaro, Cambridge, MA, Curt Thompson, International Brotherhood of Police Officers, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mark B. Stern, Robert M. Loeb, Dept. of Justice, Appellate Staff, Civ. Div., Washington, DC, Sharon Douglas Stokes, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:97-CV-276-RCF); Richard C. Freeman, Judge.

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, HULL, Circuit Judge, and LENARD*, District Judge.

HATCHETT, Chief Judge:

¶1

This case is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough and well-reasoned order dated July 2, 1997, and cited as 968 F.Supp. 1564 (N.D.Ga.1997).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

Honorable Joan A. Lenard, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation