Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 F.3d 1332 - Green v. Mortham

Green v. Mortham’s Empirical Analysis

155 F.3d 1332 · 1998

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
January 2022
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2022

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1001998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Anderson v. Celebrezze · Bullock v. Carter · Burdick v. Takushi · Jenness v. Fortson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “important state interest in requiring some preliminary showing of a significant modicum of support before printing the name of a political organization's candidate on the ballot—the interest, if no other, in avoiding confusion, deception, and even frustration of the democratic process at the general election.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There is a range of fees and signature requirements that are constitutional, and [a state] legislature is free to choose its ballot access requirements from that constitutional spectrum.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no more free to impose the legislative judgments of other states on a sister state than it is free to substitute its own judgment for that of the state legislature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.