Wilson v. Greene’s Empirical Analysis
155 F.3d 396 · 1998
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 4 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Skaggs v. Parker (2000), 863 So. 2d 776 - Wilcher v. State (2003)
24 federal appellate · 4 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Gideon v. Wainwright · Murray v. Carrier · Lindh v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Constitution does not entitle a criminal defendant to the effective assistance of an expert witness.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hinton v. State · Davie v. Mitchell“Though claims of insufficient evidence are cognizable on collateral review, a federal court’s review of such claims is “sharply limited.” Federal review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a state conviction is not meant to consider anew the jury’s guilt determination or to replace the state’s system of direct appellate review. [This] standard “must be applied with explicit reference to the substance elements of the criminal offense as defined by state law.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Ramdass v. Angelone · Bacon v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.