Tiltti v. Weise’s Empirical Analysis
155 F.3d 596 · 1998
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably Ruotolo v. City of New York (2008), Dotson v. Griesa (2005)
7 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois · United States v. Fausto · Board of County Commissioners Wabaunsee County Kansas v. Umbehr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“expressing dissatisfaction with working conditions is not, by itself, speech on matters of public concern” that is entitled to First Amendment protection. The Court cannot see how Joseph's e-mails were anything other than expressions of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Joseph v. Leavitt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.