Coulter v. Gilmore’s Empirical Analysis
155 F.3d 912 · 1998
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Dean Foods Company v. Ben Brancel, Secretary of the Wisconsin Dept. Of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (1999), 776 So. 2d 443 - State v. Givens (2001)
24 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Ornelas v. United States · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Lindh v. Murphy · Hernandez v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n addition to reviewing the reasons given for striking each individual prospective juror, [the trial court must] consider! ] the totality of the circumstances and compare[] the prosecutor’s strikes against African-Americans against its treatment of similarly situated Caucasians.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“'[m]ost mixed questions of law and fact that require the application of constitutional principles to historical fact receive de novo review.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[T]he juror-by-juror inquiry that the trial court conducted, unsupplemented by any final look at the record as a whole despite counsel’s efforts to present this evidence to the court, practically guaranteed the conclusion that the prosecution was acting race neutrally.” Coulter v. Gilmore, 155 F.3d at 921 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.