¶1 Leslie Franklin Evans, III, appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion to modify his sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Evans, No. CR-95-192 (E.D. Va. *672 June 8, 2005; filed June 21, 2005 & entered June 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED