Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Fla. 111 - Ex Parte Sullivan

Ex Parte Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2007 · most notably Leach v. State (1961), Ford v. United States (1953)

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

801944195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scott v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact of being a deputy sheriff is a ground of challenge for cause, Section 913.03, Florida Statutes 1941, F.S.A., but if the right to challenge for cause is not exercised before the juror is sworn to try the cause it is lost, Section 913.04, Florida Statutes 1941, F.S.A. If one of the jurors was in fact a deputy sheriff, it was a matter of record available to the petitioner at the trial and should have been seasonably raised. He should have been challenged for cause and exception taken on refusal of the challenge. The challenged error could have then been reviewed on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that the juror in question was biased or prejudiced or that he did not receive a fair and impartial trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]o hold otherwise would render trials interminable and impose an undue burden on the taxpayer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.