Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Fla. 169 - Johnson v. Weiner

Johnson v. Weiner’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2023 · most notably Zinermon v. Burch (1990), Courson v. McMillian (1991)

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 57 state decisions

260194419501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on S. H. Kress & Co. v. Powell · Fisher and Fisher v. Payne · Dodson v. Solomon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the unlawful restraint of a person against his will, the gist of which action is the unlawful detention of the plaintiff and the deprivation of his liberty.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To be liable in an action for false imprisonment, one must have personally and actively participated therein, directly or by indirect procurement. All those who, by direct act or indirect procurement, personally participate in or proximately cause the false imprisonment and unlawful detention are liable therefor.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[v]oid process will not constitute legal authority within this rule.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.