Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Fla. 545 - Motley v. State

Motley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 98 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably 981 So. 2d 449 - Martinez v. State (2008), 412 So. 2d 347 - Bryant v. State (1982)

2 federal appellate · 98 state decisions

28019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Garner v. State · Croft v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the trial court attempts to define the offense, for the commission of which an accused is being tried, it is the duty of the court to instruct the jury as to each and every essential element of the offense charged, and a charge attempting to define the offense which does not cover material elements of the offense is necessarily misleading and prejudicial to the accused. It is equivalent to directing the jury that it is not necessary for the state to prove any elements of the offense except those included in the definition given by the court.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Where there is any evidence introduced at trial which supports the theory of the defense, a defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on the law applicable to his theory of defense when he so requests.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"... if you should find in this case that the defendant was assaulted by the [complaining] witness..., and that he used only such force as was necessary or as was reasonable ..., then he is justified in using such force as was necessary to repel the assault, even to the extent of taking human life."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.