Samuels v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2020
3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Arthur Young & Co. · In re Sealed Case · United States v. Kovel · United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. · In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Horowitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If privileged documents or communications are disclosed to accountants for a purpose other than securing legal advice, the privilege is waived.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.