United States v. Hanhardt’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 2006
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500
Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · United States v. Cronic · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Ungar v. Sarafite · Wheat v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“MR. SCULLY [Assistant United States Attorney]: Just one other matter your Honor. There is going to be a minor — - there is going to be a superseding indictment, just to correct two errors in the indictment. One has to deal with a reference back to a wrong paragraph, and the other was some language that kind of dangled on at the end of a paragraph. THE COURT: Well, it will require re-arraignment. MR. SCULLY: It doesn’t substantively change, but it might well— it might well require arraignment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“MR. SULLIVAN [Hanhardt’s counsel]: Your Honor, I want to reiterate what Mr. Podliska said to you, and that is that on September 17th I am to begin a trial before Judge— or, Frank McGarr as an arbitrator that’s been set for .a long time, and that’s a firm commitment that I have. THE COURT: Well, things change from time to time. MR. SULLIVAN: They do. They do. I will keep you advised if it changes. THE COURT: Yes. And you can do that on June 6th certainly. ■ Tell me.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“THE COURT: I’m going to grant the motion in part but deny it in part. We will continue the date from May 18th to June 1st, which is two additional weeks. And on a very strong showing the Court might grant yet another extension from June 1st, but it will not be enough to say that “There is so much material that we can’t quite analyze it all and deal with it in order to meet these deadlines.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.