¶1The exception in this case is to the first grant of a new trial; and therefore, in order to determine whether the verdict rendered by the jury was demanded, a proper brief of the evidence is essential. What purports to be a brief of the evidence consists, in the main, of a full stenographic report of the testimony, containing all of the questions to the witnesses and their answei's. This is not a sufficient compliance with the statute; and therefore the judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
155 Ga. 481
Moore v. Walton
Decided April 13, 1923
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1923-04-13
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1949
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1923-04-13
View the full empirical analysis of this case →