McDavid v. Kiroglu’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Karlson v. Harris · Knight Ins., Inc. v. Knight · Berg v. Kendall · Telford v. Mart Produce, Inc. · Wright v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 11(b)(3) provides a readily identifiable, straightforward requirement for counsel and the courts to satisfy. Compliance with the rule obviates any need for judges to weigh conflicting evidence of actual notice or to speculate concerning a litigant's state of mind. An entitlement to relief produces consistent, predictable results, unaffected by the varying philosophies that underlie exercises of discretion by individual judges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nunez v. Johnson“Judgments taken against a party whose attorney withdrew without strict compliance with the rule are void and must be set aside as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nunez v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.