Bucklen. v. Hasterlik’s Empirical Analysis
1895
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1930
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedBucklen v. Hasterlik
Relationships
Relies on Marshall v. Vicksburg · Lyman v. Gedney · Livingston v. Tompkins · Webster v. French · Junius Horsburg v. Martin Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Then how the person who was in default can, upon that default and in consequence of that default, acquire any right to the money, which was parted with as a security that there should be no default, it is difficult to conceive.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Summers v. Hedenberg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.