Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 ILL2D 208 - People v. Laws

People v. Laws’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2016

7 state decisions

30199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Iannelli v. United States · 231 Ill. App. 3d 510 - People v. Melgoza · Shannon v. Commonwealth · 196 Ill. App. 3d 310 - People v. Urban · People v. Purcell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As generally stated, [Wharton’s] Rule prohibits prosecution of a conspiracy to commit a particular crime when the commission of that crime requires the participation of more than one person. The crimes of dueling, bigamy, adultery, and incest are the classic Wharton’s Rule offenses. Commentators have added to that list the crimes of pandering, gambling, the buying and selling of contraband goods, and the giving and receiving of bribes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As generally stated, the Rule can be misleading. The Rule does not prohibit prosecution of a conspiracy simply because the substantive crime involves the participation of two or more actors. It prohibits only such prosecution when the cooperative conduct inherent in the substantive crime is indistinguishable from the element of agreement in the alleged conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.