Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Ind. App. 100 - Wilson v. State

155 Ind. App. 100 - Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
September 1986
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Asher v. State · Dembowski v. State · Robbins v. State · Thomas v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Wilson has not presented us with authority, nor have we been able to discover authority for the proposition that representation of co-defendants for the purpose of negotiating a plea, per se, is a conflict of interest. Wilson’s attorney had instructions to obtain for each defendant sentences of the least possible amount of time. This he successfully accomplished. We cannot, therefore, say that there was demonstrable conflicting interests.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.