155 Ind. App. 361 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably D. H. v. J. H. (1981), 162 Ind. App. 50 - Clemons v. State (1974)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on White v. State · Shira v. State ex rel. Ham · Turner v. State · GUNDER v. State · 142 Ind. App. 192 - Reed v. Trainor D/B/A Tri-City R. & Smw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"What might very well constitute prejudicial error in the form of testimony given before a jury does not necessarily constitute prejudicial error in a trial to the court. It must be remembered that a trial judge is presumed to know the intricacies and refinements of the rules of evidence and that he sifts the evidence and weighs it in the light of his legal experience and expertise. He is thus able to separate the wheat from the chaff, ignoring the extraneous, the incompetent and the irrelevant and it is only when his judgment has apparently or obviously been infected by erroneously admitted evidence that we will set it aside."”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“the evidence itself plainly discloses the basis for objection, [and] we deem it not wholly inappropriate to comment upon King's contentions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shanks v. State“Yes we had arrested him approximately ten days before that.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shanks v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.