155 Ind. App. 404 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
January 1981
most recently cited
33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chimel v. California · Ker v. State of California · Harris v. United States · Hester v. United States · United States v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence is in question, we examine it carefully, not for the purpose of finding whether or not it is adequate to overcome every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, but with the view of deciding whether an inference may be reasonably drawn therefrom tending to support the finding of the trial court. Stice v. State (1950), 228 Ind. 144 , 89 N.E.2d 915 ; Petillo v. State (1950), 228 Ind. 97 , 82 N.E.2d 623 .” See also Finger v. State (1973), 260 Ind. 148 , 293 N.E.2d 25 ; Walker v. State, supra; Haynes v. State (1973), 155 Ind. App. 472 , 293 N.E.2d 204 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““In Chimel there was no basic disagreement between the majority and the dissenters over the question of a search of the person at the time and incident to a valid arrest. Likewise, in Paxton v. State, [255] Ind. [264], 263 N.E.2d 636 (1970), there was no basic difference in our own Supreme Court when it followed and applied Chimel . In Paxton as in Chimel both the majority and dissenting opinions were premised on the accepted proposition that an arresting police officer may, incident to a valid arrest, search the person and the clothing of the arrestee.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The test for probable cause to make an arrest is whether at the time of the arrest the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the officers and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information were sufficient to warrant a prudent man of reasonable caution in believing that the arrestee had committed or was committing an offense.” (My emphasis.) Smith v. State (1971), 256 Ind. 603 , 271 N.E.2d 133 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.