Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Ind. App. 440 - Etherton v. Wyatt

155 Ind. App. 440 - Etherton v. Wyatt’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
March 1998
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 1998

17 state decisions

130197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carr v. State ex rel. Coetlosquet · 121 Ind. App. 302 - State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad · Kramer v. Beebe · Payne, President v. Buchanan · 151 Ind. App. 119 - Kinzel v. Rettinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(A) Venue. ■ Any case may be venued, commenced and decided in any court in any county . (D) Other venue statutes superseded by this rule. Any provision of these rules and any special or general statute relating to venue, the place of trial or the authority of the court to hear the case shall be subject to this rule, and the provisions of any statute fixing more stringent rules thereon shall be ineffective. No statute or rule fixing the place of trial shall be deemed a requirement of jurisdiction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““As observed in the comments of the Civil Code Study Commission, the rule now applies to the State, so that the oppressive statute formerly construed as allowing claims against the State only to be litigated in the Superior Court of Marion County has now been broadened to permit suit in any county of the state subject only to the preferred venue requirements of Rule 75(A) and particularly subdivision (5) thereof.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.