Protzman v. Palmer’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 1964
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Biby v. City of Wichita · White v. Central Mutual Insurance · Peoples State Bank v. Hoisington Cooperative Mercantile Manufacturing Ass'n · Lebanon State Bank ex rel. Johnson v. Finch · Habegger v. Skalla
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An adverse party in a civil action on whom notice of appeal to the supreme court must be served (under G. 8. 1935, 60-3306) is a party to the litigation, to whose interest it is that the judgment of .the trial court be upheld, and who is interested in opposing the relief sought by appellant.” (Syl. 111.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“. . A copy of such notice must be personally served on all adverse parties whose rights are sought to be affected by the appeal, and who appeared and took part in the trial, or their attorneys of record. . . .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Appeals to the supreme court shall be taken by notice filed with the clerk of the trial court, stating that the party filing the same appeals from the judgment. ... A copy of such notice must be personally served on all adverse parties ... or their attorneys of record . . .” (G. S. 1935, 60-3306.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cochran v. Amrine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.