State v. Gould’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1985
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Aspara · State v. Goodson · State v. Buhler · State v. Thompson · State v. Ardoin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The matter of furnishing a bill of particulars rests largely in the discretion of the trial judge, and his ruling will not be disturbed unless there is manifest error, and particularly in the absence of a clear showing that the defendant was prejudiced. 1 Bishop, Crim.Proc. 643, State v. Buhler, 132 La. [1065], 1066, 62 So. 145 . “The case as presented to the trial judge on the motion for a bill of particulars fully answered the constitutional requirement, ‘that the accused shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ezell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.