Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Md. App. 247 - Hoffman v. Stamper

155 Md. App. 247 - Hoffman v. Stamper’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia · Knapp v. United States · Wilhelm v. State · Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc. · Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. Seney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Circuit Administrative Judge of the court ordering removal shall designate the county to which the case is to be removed. When the court orders that the action be removed for trial to a court of another county, the clerk shall transmit the record to that court within five days from entry of the order, unless the court ordering the removal extends the time. The record shall consist of all the original papers filed in the action and copy of the docket entries. 23”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The threshold question for the circuit court on a motion for removal—whether there is reasonable ground to believe the allegation that the moving party cannot receive a fair and impartial trial in the county in which the action is pending— is a mixed question of law and fact concerning a constitutional right. Accordingly, on appeal, we review that threshold determination de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.