155 Md. App. 394 - Chilcoat v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
29 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Muscarello v. United States · Porzig v. Nolden · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health · Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle Administration · Degren v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the statute [present CL § 3-202(a)(l) ] prohibits not only causing, but attempting to cause, a serious physical injury to another. Although the State must prove that an individual had a specific intent to cause a serious physical injury, a jury may infer the necessary intent from an individual’s conduct and the surrounding circumstances, whether or not the victim suffers such an injury. Also, the jury may “infer that ‘one intends the natural and probable consequences of his act.’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“§ 11-606. Payment of restitution (a) Restitution recipients. — The court may order that restitution be paid to: (1) the victim; (2) the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, or any other governmental unit; (3) a third-party payor, including: (1) an insurer; or (ii) any other person that has, under Part I of this subtitle: 1. compensated the victim for a property or pecuniaiy loss; or 2. paid an expense on behalf of a victim; (4) any person for whom restitution is authorized by law; or (5) a person who has provided to or for a victim goods, property, or services for which restitution is authorized under § 11-603 of this subtitle. (b) Priority of restitution payments. — (1) Subject to paragraph (2) of this subsection, payment of restitution to the victim has priority over payment of restitution to any other person or governmental unit. (2) If the victim has been fully compensated for the victim’s loss by a third-party payor, the court may issue a judgment of restitution that directs the restitution obligor to pay restitution to the third-party payor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Breakfield v. State“by evidence establishing that the defendant inflicted physical injury by “an act performed under circumstances that create a substantial risk of death.” This definition of serious physical injury focuses on the circumstances in which the defendant performed the act that caused physical injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.