155 Misc. 2d 1014 - In re C.S.’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“empower[ ] pimps to exploit children [by] knowing that they will not be long removed from the streets because the [fJamily [ejourt lacks jurisdiction.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re BW · In re B.D.S.D.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.