Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 N.C. App. 120 - State v. Holliman

155 N.C. App. 120 - State v. Holliman’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

48 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Benson · State v. Benson · State v. Hunter · State v. Conner · Weil v. . Herring

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where a theory argued on appeal was not raised before the trial court, the law does not permit parties to swap horses between courts in order to get a better mount in the appellate courts.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In order to preserve a question for appellate review, a party must have presented to the trial court a timely request, objection or motion, stating the specific grounds for the ruling the party desired the court to make if the specific grounds were not apparent from the context.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The elements need only be alleged to the extent that the indictment (1) identifies the offense; (2) protects against double jeopardy; (3) enables the defendant to prepare for trial; and (4) supports a judgment on conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.