Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 NJSUPER 512 - State v. Hamlet

State v. Hamlet’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1980
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Juidice v. Vail · Dillingham v. United States · 118 N.J. Super. 22 - State v. Roundtree

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the record reflects that the efforts to locate defendant were not thorough or exhaustive, nevertheless there is substantial evidence to support the finding by the court that ‘reasonable’ efforts were undertaken. These included inquiries at available addresses and post office facilities, examination of telephone directories, inquiries at Essex County and State correctional institutions and at the office of the Newark Welfare Agency, as well as notification by teletype of appropriate police authorities throughout the country that defendant was wanted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.