¶1 Reargument ordered upon the question: Whether the plaintiff and defendants were not engaged in a common *635 scheme as directors to defraud the stockholders of the company, and whether, if that be the case, the courts should interfere in behalf of either.
155 N.Y. 634
Mason v. . Robison
Decided January 18, 1898
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1898-01-18
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1955
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1898-01-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →