Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Ohio App. 3d 135 - Long v. Grill

155 Ohio App. 3d 135 - Long v. Grill’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Shaffer v. Heitner · Goldstein v. Christiansen · Kentucky Oaks Mall Co. v. Mitchell's Formal Wear, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “who, acting directly or by an agent, has caused an event to occur out of which the claim that is the subject of the complaint arose, from the person's * * * [t]ransacting any business in this state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “With no better guideline than the bare wording of the statute to establish whether a nonresident is transacting business in Ohio, the court must, therefore, rely on a case-by-case determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`a one-shot deal' or a single, isolated act”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.