155 Ohio App. 3d 245 - Thorp v. Strigari’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “When a plaintiff sues an individual employee of a political subdivision, the analysis begins with R.C. 2744.03(A)(6).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Cramer v. Auglaize Acres, Unpublished Decision (7-18-2005) · Campbell v. City of Youngstown, 06 Ma 184 (12-31-2007)

2. “In addition to any immunity or defense referred to in division (A)(7) of this section and in circumstances not covered by that division or sections 3314.07 and 3746.24 of the Revised Code, the employee is immune from liability unless one of the following applies: {¶ 28} "(a) The employee's acts or omissions were manifestly outside the scope of the employee's employment or official responsibilities; {¶ 29} "(b) The employee's acts or omissions were with malicious purpose, in bad faith, or in a wanton or reckless manner; {¶ 30} "(c) Civil liability is expressly imposed upon the employee by a section of the Revised Code. Civil liability shall not be construed to exist under another section of the Revised Code merely because that section imposes a responsibility or mandatory duty upon an employee, because that section provides for a criminal penalty, because of a general authorization in that section that an employee may sue and be sued, or because the section uses the term `shall' in a provision pertaining to an employee.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Campbell v. City of Youngstown, 06 Ma 184 (12-31-2007)