155 Ohio App. 3d 396 - State v. Ramos’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

86 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a citation and to perform routine procedures such as a computer check on the motorist's driver's license, registration and vehicle plates.”

   7 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Pryor, Unpublished Decision (5-27-2005) · State v. Hudson, Unpublished Decision (6-18-2004)

2. “[t]he duration of a traffic stop may last no longer than is necessary to resolve the issue that led to the original stop, absent some specific and articulable facts that further detention was reasonable.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Pryor, Unpublished Decision (5-27-2005) · State v. Phillips

3. “When a police officer's objective justification to continue detention of a person stopped for a traffic violation for the purpose of searching the person's vehicle is not related to the purpose of the original stop, and when that continued detention is not based on any articulable facts giving rise to a suspicion of some illegal activity justifying an extension of the detention, the continued detention to conduct a search constitutes an illegal seizure.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Wilkins, Unpublished Decision (7-23-2004)