155 Ohio App. 3d 40 - Nardecchia v. Nardecchia’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2022
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc. · 53 Ohio St. 2d 9 - Doddridge v. Fitzpatrick · 81 Ohio St. 3d 239 - In re Whitman · 11 Ohio App. 3d 112 - Associated Estates Corp. v. Fellows
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`If consent or mutuality did not exist when the parties entered into the separation agreement because of fraud or material mistake or misrepresentation, then there was no agreement upon which the dissolution decree could have been based. This lack of mutuality undermines the integrity of the dissolution proceeding and may constitute sufficient grounds to set aside the decree under Civ.R. 60(B).'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]ll that [the wife] was required to show was that * * * (2) a mistake of fact had occurred that was material to one of the issues to be determined by the decree of dissolution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.