Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Ohio App. 3d 471 - Peck v. Serio

155 Ohio App. 3d 471 - Peck v. Serio’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · State v. Wolons · 33 Cal. 2d 80 - Summers v. Tice · Malone v. Courtyard by Marriott Ltd. Partnership · Minnich v. Ashland Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The rule stated in Subsection (3) applies only where it is proved that each of two or more actors has acted tortiously, and that the harm has resulted from the conduct of some one of them. On these issues the plaintiff has still the burden of proof. The rule stated has no application to cases of alternative liability, where there is no proof that the conduct of more than one actor has been tortious at all. In such a case the plaintiff has the burden of proof both as to the tortious conduct and as to the causal relation." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433B(3), cmt. g.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When reviewing a trial court's jury instructions, the proper standard of review for an appellate court is whether the trial court's refusal to give a requested jury instruction constituted an abuse of discretion under the facts and circumstances of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.