155 Ohio App. 3d 479 - Sovak v. Spivey’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2025
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ. · Spercel v. Sterling Industries, Inc. · Wisintainer v. Elcen Power Strut Co. · Gilbraith v. Hixson · 60 Ohio App. 3d 21 - Witt v. Ward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n agreed judgment entry is a contract that is reduced to judgment by a court.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“has not agreed to the [agreed] judgment [entry], * * * it can hardly be said to be binding on that party * * * [n]or can it be presumed that a party has waived any rights by the mere fact of failing to join in an agreed judgment entry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.