Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Ohio App. 3d 742 - State v. Sowry

155 Ohio App. 3d 742 - State v. Sowry’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
10
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Cole (2007), State v. Alvarado (2008)

32 state decisions — followed in 10 states

190200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jenks · State v. Bridgeman · Union Pac Ry Co v. Botsford · 114 Ohio App. 3d 738 - State v. Miley · 3 Ohio App. 3d 265 - State v. Grimsley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “at most, [the defendant] might be charged with knowing that drugs were on his person when officers conveyed him to jail. However, * * * the law will not punish for a guilty mind alone. Because [the defendant's] conduct with respect to the R.C. 2921.36 (A)(2) violation with which he was charged cannot satisfy the requirement for criminal liability that R.C. 2901.22 (A)(1) imposes, the trial court erred when it denied defendant-appellant Sowry's Crim. R. 29 motion for acquittal.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) The person's liability is based on conduct that includes either a voluntary act, or an omission to perform an act or duty that the person is capable of performing;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`the relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.