Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Ohio App. 3d 99 - Funk v. Durant

155 Ohio App. 3d 99 - Funk v. Durant’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2024

9 state decisions

60200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dresher v. Burt · Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc. · Vahila v. Hall · Layman v. Binns · 68 Ohio App. 2d 255 - Friedland v. Lipman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a representation or, where there is a duty to disclose, concealment of a fact, (2) which is material to the transaction at hand, (3) made falsely, with knowledge of its falsity, or with such utter disregard and recklessness as to whether it is true or false that knowledge may be inferred, (4) with the intent of misleading another into relying upon it, (5) followed by justifiable reliance upon the representation or concealment by the other party, and (6) a resulting injury proximately caused by the reliance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.