Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

155 Or. App. 642

Jensen v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1998

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1998-09-02

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2004

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-09-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM

¶1Petitioner appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Our review is limited to errors of law, including whether the facts found by the post- conviction court are supported by the record. Yeager v. Maass, 93 Or App 561, 564, 763 P2d 184 (1988), rev den 307 Or 340 (1989).

¶2Petitioner contends on appeal that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel when his lawyer failed to advise him, before he agreed to a stipulated facts trial, that he could receive consecutive sentences and a gun minimum sentence. Turczynski v. Grill, 134 Or App 351, 895 P2d 787 (1995), establishes that the court properly rejected the claim.

¶3We reject petitioner’s remaining assignments of error without discussion.

¶4Affirmed.

/155/orapp/642 · .json · Public domain