Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Pa. Super. 224 - Thomas v. Bache

155 Pa. Super. 224 - Thomas v. Bache’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 1990
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1990

8 state decisions

20194419501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc. · Simonton v. Morton · Joseph v. United Workers Assn. · Venezia v. Philadelphia Electric Co. · Brooks v. Buckley & Banks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We feel obliged, at the outset, to state that the referee and the board were bound by the stipulation of facts agreed upon by the parties and filed of record at the first hearing. The compensation authorities were not at liberty to make findings contrary to, or contradictory of, the stipulated facts ... Any finding of fact which is opposed to the facts as stipulated will be disregarded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.