Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 So. 2d 10 - State v. Lampp

155 So. 2d 10 - State v. Lampp’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
November 1993
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 1993

20 state decisions

1201963197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Tune · United States v. Garsson · People v. Miller · People v. Duncan · Reed v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a complete and utter stranger to criminal proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “No broad right of discovery exists, however, in criminal cases; the common law recognized no right of discovery in such cases, and it has been held that unless introduced by appropriate legislation, the doctrine of discovery is a complete and utter stranger to criminal procedure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The order in question departs so far from the established practice and the public policy of the State that certiorari is granted and the subject order is quashed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.