Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 So. 2d 646 - Pickman v. State

155 So. 2d 646 - Pickman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 1992
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 1992

12 state decisions

601963197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 140 So. 2d 597 - State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Cochran · 97 So. 2d 631 - State Ex Rel. Ard v. Shelby · 140 So. 2d 300 - Bell v. Cochran · Ex Parte Bosso

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Petitioner insists that an affidavit of violation filed after the expiration of the probationary period is incompetent as a basis for revocation of probation. We agree. Section 948.04 F.S., F.S.A., provides that upon termination of the period of probation "the probationer shall be released from probation and shall not be liable to sentence for the crime for which probation was allowed.' It is clear that upon expiration of the probationary period the court is divested of all jurisdiction over the person of the probationer unless in the meantime the processes of the court have been set in motion for revocation or modification of the probation pursuant to Section 948.06, F.S., F.S.A. * * *"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"The court shall determine the terms and conditions of probation and may include among them the following: That the probationer shall (a) avoid injurious or vicious habits; (b) avoid persons or places of disreputable or harmful character; (c) report to the parole and probation supervisors as directed; (d) permit such supervisors to visit him at his home, or elsewhere; (e) work faithfully at suitable employment insofar as may be possible; (f) remain within a specified place; (g) make reparation or restitution to the aggrieved party for the damage or loss caused by his offense in an amount to be determined by the court; (h) support his legal dependents to the best of his ability."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We think that appellant's position must be sustained under the holding in State ex rel. Ard v. Shelby, Fla.App. 1957, 97 So.2d 631 , in which it was held that upon expiration of the probationary period, the court is divested of all jurisdiction of the person of the probationer unless in the meantime, the processes of the court have been set in motion for revocation or modification of the probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.