Grant v. Sneed’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 977 So. 2d 880 - Samaha v. Rau · 842 So. 2d 373 - Allen v. EXHIBITION HALL AUTHORITY · 76 So. 3d 1178 - Aubrey v. Zurich American Insurance · 914 So. 2d 612 - McGinnis v. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF LOUISIANA · Course v. Fox Wolff Const.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The burden of proof rests with the mover. Nevertheless, if the mover will not bear the burden of proof at trial on the issue that is before the court on the motion for summary judgment, the mover's burden on the motion does not require him to negate all essential elements of the adverse party's claim, action, or defense, but rather to point out to the court the absence of factual support for one or more elements essential to the adverse party's claim, action, or defense. The burden is on the adverse party to produce factual support sufficient to establish the existence of a genuine issue of material fact or that the mover is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.