Hatfield v. Hatfield’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 764 So. 2d 1186 - Harper v. Harper · State ex rel. C.W. v. Wilson · 704 So. 2d 415 - L & M Products, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Dev. · 855 So. 2d 913 - State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Wilson · DSS EX REL. CJV v. Neathery
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. If a party ... fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery ... the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others any of the following: [[Image here]] (3)An order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party. [[Image here]] C.In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party failing to obey the order or the attorney advising him or both to pay the | ¿reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, caused by the failure, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alcorn v. Duncan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.