Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

155 S.W.3d 768

Snelling v. McFadden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 2004

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2004-11-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2016

1 state decisions

Relies on Griggs v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-11-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Lonnie Snelling appeals from orders of the trial court granting defendants Larry T. and Eufabya McFadden’s, Bernice Evans’,1 and Albert Johnson’s motions to set aside default judgments entered against them and in favor of Snelling.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motions. Hinton v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., 99 S.W.3d 454, 458 (Mo.App. E.D.2003) (standard of review). No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

¶4. Evans is the guardian for minor Johnson.

/155/sw3d/768 · .json · Public domain