Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 155 Tex. 195 - Schley v. Couch

Schley v. Couch’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
9
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2012 · most notably Favorite v. Miller (1978), Klein v. Unidentified Wrecked & Abandoned Sailing Vessel (1985)

6 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

1201955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grigsby v. Reib · Swayne v. Lone Acre Oil Co. · Diversion Lake Club v. Heath · Jackson v. Steinberg · Weeks v. Hackett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Lost property” is property which the owner has involuntarily parted with through neglect, carelessness, or inadvertence, that is, property which the owner has unwittingly suffered to pass out of his possession, and of whose whereabouts he has no knowledge. Property is deemed lost when it is unintentionally separated from the dominion of its owner. Popularly, property is lost when the owner does not know, and cannot ascertain, where it is, the essential test of lost property is whether the owner parted with the possession of the property intentionally, casually or involuntarily; only in the latter contingency may it be lost property. Property is not “lost” unless the owner parts with it involuntarily and unintentionally, and does not, at any time thereafter, know where to find it. A loss is always involuntary; there can be no intent to part with the ownership of lost property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Where property is found embedded in the soil under circumstances repelling the idea that it has been lost, the finder acquires no title thereto, for the presumption is that the possession of the article found is in the owner of the locus in quo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.