Workman v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 1990 · most notably Whirl v. Kern (1968), Lozano v. Smith (1983)
15 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gray v. De Bretton · King v. Brown · 31 Tex. Civ. App. 291 - Maddox v. Hudgeons · McBeath v. Campbell · Taylor v. Stanford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[SJheriffs are made responsible [by statute] for the “official” acts of their deputies, and are given the same remedies against such deputies and their sureties as any person can have against the sheriff and his sureties. In the use of the term “official” in this statute, when construed with its connected clause, the Legislature must be presumed to have had knowledge of the well-defined distinction between official acts and acts done colore officii — a distinction upon which many of the apparently conflicting cases may perhaps be reconciled — and to have therefore intended to exclude responsibility for mere usurpation of authority on the part of their deputies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Williams v. Thomas“that the sheriff was guilty of any undue delay the next morning in finding out the facts about Workman's being in jail or in taking such appropriate action as the facts required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Whirl v. Kern“exercise a supervision and control over the jail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Whirl v. Kern
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.