155 Tex. Crim. 370 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
April 1978
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 118 Tex. Crim. 566 - Naugle v. State · 155 Tex. Crim. 113 - Tuck v. State · Shelton v. State · 155 Tex. Crim. 35 - Fowler v. State · 54 Tex. Crim. 30 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We fail to see how the jury could have been misled, or how they could have failed to have comprehended the law on the subject of alibi.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.